Fujifilm
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR — 120mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Jan 2019
Fujifilm
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
World's fastest medium-format autofocus lens — F1.7 portrait prime with 795g body and weather sealing.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2021
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR is 1.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Wins
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.5 × vs 0.15 ×)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.7 vs f/4)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.7 vs f/4)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Weight (795 g vs 1520 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
⌀89 × 152 mm
1520 g (3.35 lb / 53.62 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
⌀95 × 99 mm
795 g (1.75 lb / 28.04 oz)
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 53mm longer and 6mm narrower than GF 80mm F1.7 R WR.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 725 g heavier than GF 80mm F1.7 R WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
45 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.5 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
89 mm vs 94.7 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.7 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.7 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
795 g vs 1520 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99.2 mm vs 152 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR and GF 80mm F1.7 R WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.