Fujifilm
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR — 110mm f/2 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Jan 2017
Fujifilm
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
World's fastest medium-format autofocus lens — F1.7 portrait prime with 795g body and weather sealing.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2021
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR is 4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Wins
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Min focus distance (70 cm vs 90 cm)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Weight (795 g vs 1005 g)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.7 vs f/2)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.7 vs f/2)
- BGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Length (99.2 mm vs 114.9 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 110mm F2 R LM WR
⌀89 × 115 mm
1005 g (2.22 lb / 35.45 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
⌀95 × 99 mm
795 g (1.75 lb / 28.04 oz)
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR is 16mm longer and 6mm narrower than GF 80mm F1.7 R WR.
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR is 210 g heavier than GF 80mm F1.7 R WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Diameter
89 mm vs 94.7 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.16 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
70 cm vs 90 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
795 g vs 1005 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.7 vs f/2 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.7 vs f/2 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99.2 mm vs 114.9 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 110mm F2 R LM WR and GF 80mm F1.7 R WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Fujifilm GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.