Canon
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
The cornerstone zoom for Canon mirrorless, featuring 5 stops of optical image stabilization.
$2,399
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Fujifilm
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR — 110mm f/2 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Jan 2017
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM is 2.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Wins
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 90 cm)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BGF 110mm F2 R LM WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
- BGF 110mm F2 R LM WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
⌀88 × 125 mm
900 g (1.98 lb / 31.75 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
⌀89 × 115 mm
1005 g (2.22 lb / 35.45 oz)
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM is 10mm longer and 1mm narrower than GF 110mm F2 R LM WR.
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM is 105 g lighter than GF 110mm F2 R LM WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 UD
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 90 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
900 g vs 1005 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Custom function button
Only GF 110mm F2 R LM WR supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
114.9 mm vs 125 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization (up to 5 stops)
- ✓Excellent L-series sharpness and build quality
- ✓Fast and silent Nano USM focus motor
- ✓Very low chromatic aberration
Cons
- –Heavier than competitive options (900g)
- –Pricey entry threshold
- –Minor barrel distortion at 24mm
GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM and GF 110mm F2 R LM WR at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Fujifilm GF 110mm F2 R LM WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.