Sony
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II — 16–35mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Sony
FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony E Mount
World's lightest 400mm F2.8 — 2895g with 3 fluorite elements, XD Linear AF, and OSS.
$12,000
Launch priceReleased Jun 2018
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 5.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Wins
FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 270 cm)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Weight (547 g vs 2895 g)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Length (127 mm vs 359 mm)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Diameter (65 mm vs 158.1 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
⌀65 × 127 mm
547 g (1.21 lb / 19.29 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
⌀158 × 359 mm
2895 g (6.38 lb / 102.12 oz)
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 232mm shorter and 93mm narrower than FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 2348 g lighter than FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 270 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
547 g vs 2895 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
127 mm vs 359 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 158.1 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Fluorite, 1 ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS supports it
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II and FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.