Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
Tamron
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Fujifilm X Mount
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD — 150–500mm f/5-6.7 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$1,399
Launch priceReleased Jun 2024
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is 2.7 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Wins
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/6.7)
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5)
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Weight (1045 g vs 1710 g)
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Min focus distance (40 cm vs 60 cm)
- B150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 4.5 stops)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
⌀93 × 210 mm
1710 g (3.77 lb / 60.32 oz)
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 10mm shorter and 5mm narrower than 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 665 g lighter than 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA, 1 Aspherical, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/6.7 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
1045 g vs 1710 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
40 cm vs 60 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 93 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
200 mm vs 209.6 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Hybrid Aspherical, LD, BBAR-G2
- ✓
Control ring
Only 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD supports it
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 4.5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.3 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.