Tamron
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Fujifilm X Mount
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD — 150–500mm f/5-6.7 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$1,399
Launch priceReleased Jun 2024
Tamron
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Sony E Mount
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD — 17–28mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$899
Launch priceReleased Jun 2019
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is 5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Wins
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- A150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- B17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Weight (420 g vs 1710 g)
- B17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/6.7)
- B17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Length (109 mm vs 209.6 mm)
- B17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
⌀93 × 210 mm
1710 g (3.77 lb / 60.32 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
⌀86 × 109 mm
420 g (0.93 lb / 14.82 oz)
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is 101mm longer and 7mm wider than 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD.
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is 1290 g heavier than 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Hybrid Aspherical, LD, BBAR-G2
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
420 g vs 1710 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/6.7 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
109 mm vs 209.6 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 60 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
86 mm vs 93 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD and 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD at major authorized retailers.
Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.