Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
Viltrox
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 13mm F1.4 Z — 13mm f/1.4 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$479
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
AF 13mm F1.4 Z is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Wins
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher OIS effectiveness (4.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Min focus distance (14 cm vs 40 cm)
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.11 ×)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Weight (420 g vs 1045 g)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Length (90 mm vs 200 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
⌀82 × 90 mm
420 g (0.93 lb / 14.82 oz)
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 110mm longer and 6mm wider than AF 13mm F1.4 Z.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 625 g heavier than AF 13mm F1.4 Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA, 1 Aspherical, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the AF 13mm F1.4 Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 4 ED, 2 HR
- ✓
Min focus distance
14 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
420 g vs 1045 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
90 mm vs 200 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
82 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and AF 13mm F1.4 Z at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Viltrox AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.