Tamron
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Sony E Mount
An incredibly popular third-party zoom updated with vastly improved sharpness and autofocus.
$899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
Viltrox
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 13mm F1.4 Z — 13mm f/1.4 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$479
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
AF 13mm F1.4 Z is 2.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Wins
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- A28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has higher Max magnification (0.37 × vs 0.11 ×)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Length (90 mm vs 118 mm)
- BAF 13mm F1.4 Z has lower Min focus distance (14 cm vs 18 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
⌀76 × 118 mm
540 g (1.19 lb / 19.05 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
⌀82 × 90 mm
420 g (0.93 lb / 14.82 oz)
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 28mm longer and 6mm narrower than AF 13mm F1.4 Z.
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 120 g heavier than AF 13mm F1.4 Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 LD, 2 GM
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.37 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
76 mm vs 82 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the AF 13mm F1.4 Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 4 ED, 2 HR
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
90 mm vs 118 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
14 cm vs 18 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
420 g vs 540 g — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Pros
- ✓Superb value for money compared to first-party options
- ✓Excellent sharpness throughout the range, even at f/2.8
- ✓Very lightweight and compact (only 540g)
- ✓Fast VXD linear motor focus drive
- ✓Customizable lens functions via Tamron Lens Utility software
Cons
- –Starts at 28mm instead of the wider 24mm standard
- –Slightly weaker corner sharpness at 75mm wide open
- –Weather sealing is basic compared to Sony GM lenses
AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 and AF 13mm F1.4 Z at major authorized retailers.
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Viltrox AF 13mm F1.4 Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.