Tamron
18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC
Sony E Mount
18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC — 18–300mm f/3.5-6.3 for Sony E, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
Tamron
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Nikon Z Mount
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD — 35–150mm f/2-2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2023
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD is 1.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC
Wins
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- A18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- B35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/6.3)
- A18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC has lower Weight (620 g vs 1190 g)
- B35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/3.5)
- A18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC has lower Length (137 mm vs 217 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC supports it
- ✓
Weight
620 g vs 1190 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
137 mm vs 217 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 70 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/6.3 — lower is better
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Min focus distance
Both 38 cm
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC and 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD at major authorized retailers.
Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC
Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.