Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

vs
Osmo Nano

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

Osmo 360 II is 11 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

Osmo Nano

Sports & ActionTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo 360 II wins 5 categories·Osmo Nano wins 0 categories
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Battery capacity (2150 mAh vs 530 mAh)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 35 MP)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo 360 IIOsmo Nano
Resolution120 MP35 MP
Sensor1/1.1 inch1/1.3 inch
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight183 g124 g
Battery520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo Nano front view

Osmo Nano

59 × 72 × 28 mm

124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)

Osmo 360 II is 23mm narrower than Osmo Nano but it is also 9mm taller and 33mm thicker.

Osmo 360 II is 59 g heavier than Osmo Nano.

Depth (front-to-back): 61mm Osmo 360 II · 28mm Osmo Nano

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Nano back view

Osmo Nano

59 × 72 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Osmo 360 II

36 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Nano

59 × 28 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo 360 IIOsmo Nano
Portrait
3.0Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
3.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Battery capacity

    2150 mAh vs 530 mAh — higher is better

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 35 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 120 fps — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds HorizonBalancing

  • Weight

    124 g vs 183 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Waterproof depthBoth 10 m
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo 360 II
Osmo Nano
Resolution
120 MP3.4× more
35 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
1/1.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.1 inch
1/1.3 inch
AA filter
No
No
Osmo 360 II
Osmo Nano
Aperture
f/1.9
f/2.8
Field of view
143 °
Osmo 360 II
Osmo Nano
Processor
High-performance ISP
Image processor
Osmo 360 II
Osmo Nano
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
25,600
Osmo 360 II
Osmo Nano
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Osmo 360 II or Osmo Nano?

Osmo 360 II scores 6.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for Osmo Nano — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano?

Osmo 360 II is 120 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano?

Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo 360 II or the Osmo Nano?

Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano?

Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 59 g lighter.

Do the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano record 4K video?

Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Osmo 360 II and Osmo Nano weather sealed?

Osmo 360 II: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.

Which has better battery runtime?

Osmo 360 II is rated for about 100 minutes of continuous recording and Osmo Nano for about 90 minutes, giving the Osmo 360 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo 360 II launched at $599 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo 360 II vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI press materials.