Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Sep 2016

Osmo 360 II is 9.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

Lumix FZ2500

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo 360 II wins 4 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 1 categories
  • BLumix FZ2500 has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 0)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 20 frames)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • AOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 966 g)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo 360 IILumix FZ2500
Resolution120 MP20.1 MP
Sensor1/1.1 inch13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max51,20012,800
Burst30 fps50 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight183 g966 g
Battery520 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

Osmo 360 II is 101mm narrower, 21mm shorter, and 74mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500.

Osmo 360 II is 783 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 61mm Osmo 360 II · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo 360 IILumix FZ2500
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 20 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    183 g vs 966 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MOV, MP4…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye, Animal

  • Eye AF

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo 360 II
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
120 MP6× more
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
1/1.1 inch
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Osmo 360 II
Lumix FZ2500
Aperture
f/1.9
f/2.8-4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
26-520 mm
Osmo 360 II
Lumix FZ2500
Processor
High-performance ISP
Venus Engine
Osmo 360 II
Lumix FZ2500
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
51,200+2 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
25,600
Osmo 360 II
Lumix FZ2500
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Osmo 360 II or Lumix FZ2500?

Osmo 360 II scores 10.0/10 versus 4.5/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500?

Osmo 360 II is 120 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500?

Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo 360 II or the Lumix FZ2500?

Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500?

Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 783 g lighter.

Do the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Osmo 360 II and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

Osmo 360 II: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo 360 II and 350 shots for the Lumix FZ2500, giving the Osmo 360 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo 360 II launched at $599 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Osmo 360 II is $600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo 360 II vs Lumix FZ2500 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Panasonic press materials.