Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Blackmagic

URSA Mini Pro 12K

12K Super 35 cinema camera with interchangeable PL mount and BRAW recording.

$9,995

Released Jul 2020

vs
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Released May 2026

EOS R6 V is 5.8 years newer.

Wins

4categories

URSA Mini Pro 12K

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 V

WildlifeSports & Action

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

URSA Mini Pro 12K wins 1 categories·EOS R6 V wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 V has lower AF low-light limit (-6.5 EV vs 0 EV)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 0)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AURSA Mini Pro 12K has higher Resolution (80 MP vs 32.5 MP)

Key specs at a glance

URSA Mini Pro 12KEOS R6 V
Resolution80 MP32.5 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max51,20064,000
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop7.5-stop
Weight520 g688 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 4mm narrower than EOS R6 V but it is also 15mm taller and 8mm thicker.

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 168 g lighter than EOS R6 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm URSA Mini Pro 12K · 80mm EOS R6 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 98 mm

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 88 mm

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Sensor size, to scale

URSA Mini Pro 12K

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

URSA Mini Pro 12K: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseURSA Mini Pro 12KEOS R6 V
Portrait
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

URSA Mini Pro 12K

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    80 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • Weight

    520 g vs 688 g — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 V supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Horse, Airplane, Train

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

Pros

  • 12K BRAW
  • Pro cinema workflow
  • Interchangeable mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Huge files
  • Not handheld friendly

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

Full specifications

= category winner

URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R6 V
Resolution
80 MP2.5× more
32.5 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R6 V
AF system
Manual focus (cinema)
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
0
6097
AF frame coverage
0 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
0 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Horse, Vehicle, Airplane, Train
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R6 V
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames+33%
150 frames
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R6 V
Max resolution
8K / 6K
7K RAW / 7K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps
2600 Mbps4.3× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Log profile supported
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R6 V
Weight
520 g−168 g less
688 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
141.8 × 83.3 × 79.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, URSA Mini Pro 12K or EOS R6 V?

URSA Mini Pro 12K scores 9.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 V — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R6 V?

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 80 MP and EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP, so the URSA Mini Pro 12K captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R6 V have in-body image stabilization?

URSA Mini Pro 12K has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the URSA Mini Pro 12K or the EOS R6 V?

URSA Mini Pro 12K reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R6 V?

URSA Mini Pro 12K weighs 520 g and EOS R6 V weighs 688 g, so the URSA Mini Pro 12K is 168 g lighter.

Do the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R6 V record 4K video?

URSA Mini Pro 12K: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R6 V weather sealed?

URSA Mini Pro 12K: Yes. EOS R6 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the URSA Mini Pro 12K and 640 shots for the EOS R6 V, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

URSA Mini Pro 12K launched at $9,995 and EOS R6 V at $2,499. The EOS R6 V is $7,496 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Blackmagic and Canon press materials.