Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Blackmagic

URSA Mini Pro 12K

12K Super 35 cinema camera with interchangeable PL mount and BRAW recording.

$9,995

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

vs
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

EOS R1 is 4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

URSA Mini Pro 12K

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

9categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

URSA Mini Pro 12K wins 1 categories·EOS R1 wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R1 has lower AF low-light limit (-7.5 EV vs 0 EV)
  • BEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BEOS R1 has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • AURSA Mini Pro 12K has higher Resolution (80 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 520 shots)

Key specs at a glance

URSA Mini Pro 12KEOS R1
Resolution80 MP24.2 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8.5-stop
Weight520 g920 g
Battery520 shots1330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 20mm narrower and 52mm shorter than EOS R1 but it is also 1mm thicker.

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 400 g lighter than EOS R1.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm URSA Mini Pro 12K · 87mm EOS R1

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Sensor size, to scale

URSA Mini Pro 12K

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

URSA Mini Pro 12K: mount data unavailable

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseURSA Mini Pro 12KEOS R1
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

URSA Mini Pro 12K

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    80 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    520 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R1 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

Pros

  • 12K BRAW
  • Pro cinema workflow
  • Interchangeable mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Huge files
  • Not handheld friendly

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R1
Resolution
80 MP3.3× more
24.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R1
Processor
Image processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R1
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
102,400+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
409,600
URSA Mini Pro 12K
EOS R1
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/64000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, URSA Mini Pro 12K or EOS R1?

URSA Mini Pro 12K scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R1 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1?

URSA Mini Pro 12K is 80 MP and EOS R1 is 24.2 MP, so the URSA Mini Pro 12K captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1 have in-body image stabilization?

URSA Mini Pro 12K has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the URSA Mini Pro 12K or the EOS R1?

URSA Mini Pro 12K reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1?

URSA Mini Pro 12K weighs 520 g and EOS R1 weighs 920 g, so the URSA Mini Pro 12K is 400 g lighter.

Do the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1 record 4K video?

URSA Mini Pro 12K: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the URSA Mini Pro 12K and EOS R1 weather sealed?

URSA Mini Pro 12K: Yes. EOS R1: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the URSA Mini Pro 12K and 1,330 shots for the EOS R1, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

URSA Mini Pro 12K launched at $9,995 and EOS R1 at $6,299. The EOS R1 is $3,696 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way URSA Mini Pro 12K vs EOS R1 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Blackmagic and Canon press materials.