Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS 200D

Canon

EOS 200D

World's lightest APS-C DSLR (Rebel SL2) with Dual Pixel AF, 24MP, and beginner-friendly design.

$549

Launch price

Released Jun 2017

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 8.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

EOS 200D

Travel

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS 200D wins 0 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS 200DEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution24.2 MP32.5 MP
Sensor22.3 x 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60064,000
Burst11 fps40 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight453 g699 g
Battery650 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS 200D front view

EOS 200D

122 × 93 × 70 mm

453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS 200D is 16mm narrower, 6mm shorter, and 19mm thinner than EOS R6 Mark III.

EOS 200D is 246 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 70mm EOS 200D · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS 200D back view

EOS 200D

122 × 93 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS 200D top view

EOS 200D

122 × 70 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS 200D

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS 200D: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS 200DEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
3.5Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS 200D

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122.4, 92.6, 69.8

  • Weight

    453 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    650 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    180 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS 200D

Pros

  • Very light DSLR
  • Dual Pixel AF
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Affordable

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • No 4K
  • Superseded by SL3/250D

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
24.2 MP
32.5 MP+34%
Sensor type
APS-C
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 x 14.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark III
Processor
DIGIC 7
DIGIC X
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
64,000+1.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark III
Shutter type
Electronically-controlled focal-plane shutter
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS 200D or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS 200D — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS 200D is 24.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS 200D does not have IBIS, while EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS 200D or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS 200D reaches 11 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS 200D weighs 453 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS 200D is 246 g lighter.

Do the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS 200D: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS 200D: No. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 650 shots (CIPA) for the EOS 200D and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS 200D the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS 200D launched at $549 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS 200D is $2,250 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS 200D vs EOS R6 Mark III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.