Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS 200D

Canon

EOS 200D

World's lightest APS-C DSLR (Rebel SL2) with Dual Pixel AF, 24MP, and beginner-friendly design.

$549

Launch price

Released Jun 2017

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 5.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

EOS 200D

Travel

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS 200D wins 0 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS 200DEOS R6 Mark II
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
Sensor22.3 x 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst11 fps40 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight453 g670 g
Battery650 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS 200D front view

EOS 200D

122 × 93 × 70 mm

453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

EOS 200D is 16mm narrower, 6mm shorter, and 19mm thinner than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS 200D is 217 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 70mm EOS 200D · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS 200D back view

EOS 200D

122 × 93 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS 200D top view

EOS 200D

122 × 70 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS 200D

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS 200D: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS 200DEOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
3.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS 200D

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122.4, 92.6, 69.8

  • Weight

    453 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS 200D

Pros

  • Very light DSLR
  • Dual Pixel AF
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Affordable

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • No 4K
  • Superseded by SL3/250D

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 x 14.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark II
Processor
DIGIC 7
DIGIC X
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
204,800
EOS 200D
EOS R6 Mark II
Shutter type
Electronically-controlled focal-plane shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS 200D or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS 200D — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS 200D does not have IBIS, while EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS 200D or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS 200D reaches 11 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS 200D weighs 453 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g, so the EOS 200D is 217 g lighter.

Do the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS 200D: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS 200D and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS 200D: No. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 650 shots (CIPA) for the EOS 200D and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS 200D launched at $549 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS 200D is $1,950 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS 200D vs EOS R6 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.