Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS C400

RF-mount Super 35 cinema camera with 6K 60p, Cinema RAW Light, and built-in 9-stop ND.

$7,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

vs

Sony

FX6

Full-frame cinema camcorder with dual base ISO and pro broadcast features.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Nov 2020

EOS C400 is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS C400

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

FX6

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS C400 wins 4 categories·FX6 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS C400 has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AEOS C400 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AEOS C400 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS C400 has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 800)
  • BFX6 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS C400FX6
Resolution6.2 MP10.2 MP
Sensor26.1 × 13.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60012,800
Burst20 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight1450 g890 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS C400

162 × 138 × 130 mm

1450 g (3.20 lb / 51.15 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FX6

114 × 116 × 153 mm

890 g (1.96 lb / 31.39 oz)

EOS C400 is 23mm thinner than FX6 but it is also 48mm wider and 22mm taller.

EOS C400 is 560 g heavier than FX6.

Depth (front-to-back): 130mm EOS C400 · 153mm FX6

Sensor size, to scale

EOS C400

26.1 × 13.8 mm · APS-C

360 mm² area

FX6

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS C400

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX6

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS C400FX6
Portrait
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
3.5Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS C400

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, Apple ProRes

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 162, 138, 130

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 800 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

Reasons to choose

FX6

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC-I, XAVC-L, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 114, 116, 153

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only FX6 supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Resolution

    10.2 MP vs 6.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    890 g vs 1450 g — lower is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • EVF magnificationBoth 0.78 ×

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS C400

Pros

  • 6K 60p internal
  • Built-in 9-stop ND
  • Dual gain sensor
  • RF mount

Cons

  • Super 35 only
  • Premium price
  • Large media needs

FX6

Pros

  • Dual base ISO
  • Pro cinema workflow
  • Internal XAVC
  • ND filters

Cons

  • Fixed lens mount needs adapters
  • Large for solo travel
  • Premium price

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS C400 and FX6 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS C400
FX6
Resolution
6.2 MP
10.2 MP+65%
Sensor type
Super 35 Dual Gain CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
26.1 × 13.8 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS C400
FX6
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS C400
FX6
ISO min (native)
100−700 less
800
ISO max (native)
25,600+1 stop
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
409,600
EOS C400
FX6
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS C400 or FX6?

EOS C400 scores 9.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for FX6 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS C400 and FX6?

EOS C400 is 6.2 MP and FX6 is 10.2 MP, so the FX6 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS C400 and FX6 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS C400 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while FX6 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS C400 and FX6?

EOS C400 weighs 1450 g and FX6 weighs 890 g, so the FX6 is 560 g lighter.

Do the EOS C400 and FX6 record 4K video?

EOS C400: 6K 60p (max), 4K up to 120p. FX6: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS C400 and FX6 weather sealed?

EOS C400: Yes. FX6: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS C400 and 520 shots for the FX6, giving the EOS C400 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS C400 launched at $7,999 and FX6 at $5,999. The FX6 is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS C400 vs FX6 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.