Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS C400

RF-mount Super 35 cinema camera with 6K 60p, Cinema RAW Light, and built-in 9-stop ND.

$7,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

EOS C400 is 1.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

EOS C400

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS C400 wins 1 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 6.2 MP)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has lower Weight (670 g vs 1450 g)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS C400 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS C400EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution6.2 MP24.2 MP
Sensor26.1 × 13.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst20 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop8-stop
Weight1450 g670 g
Battery640 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS C400

162 × 138 × 130 mm

1450 g (3.20 lb / 51.15 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

EOS C400 is 24mm wider, 40mm taller, and 42mm thicker than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS C400 is 780 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 130mm EOS C400 · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS C400

162 × 138 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS C400

162 × 130 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS C400

26.1 × 13.8 mm · APS-C

360 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS C400

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS C400EOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS C400

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, Apple ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 162, 138, 130

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 6.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    670 g vs 1450 g — lower is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS C400

Pros

  • 6K 60p internal
  • Built-in 9-stop ND
  • Dual gain sensor
  • RF mount

Cons

  • Super 35 only
  • Premium price
  • Large media needs

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS C400
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
6.2 MP
24.2 MP3.9× more
Sensor type
Super 35 Dual Gain CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
26.1 × 13.8 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS C400
EOS R6 Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS C400
EOS R6 Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS C400
EOS R6 Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS C400 or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for EOS C400 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS C400 is 6.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS C400 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS C400 or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS C400 reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS C400 weighs 1450 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 780 g lighter.

Do the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS C400: 6K 60p (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS C400 and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS C400: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS C400 and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS C400 launched at $7,999 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $5,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS C400 vs EOS R6 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.