Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS C500 Mark II

Full-frame cinema flagship with 5.9K 60p, dual gain sensor, and modular design.

$15,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

vs
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2026

EOS R6 V is 6.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

EOS C500 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 V

Sports & ActionWildlife

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS C500 Mark II wins 0 categories·EOS R6 V wins 5 categories
  • BEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 1053)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 8.85 MP)
  • BEOS R6 V has lower Weight (688 g vs 1750 g)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS C500 Mark IIEOS R6 V
Resolution8.85 MP32.5 MP
Sensor26.1 × 13.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max51,20064,000
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop7.5-stop
Weight1750 g688 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 138 × 163 mm

1750 g (3.86 lb / 61.73 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

EOS C500 Mark II is 20mm wider, 55mm taller, and 83mm thicker than EOS R6 V.

EOS C500 Mark II is 1062 g heavier than EOS R6 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 163mm EOS C500 Mark II · 80mm EOS R6 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 138 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 163 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS C500 Mark II

26.1 × 13.8 mm · APS-C

360 mm² area

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS C500 Mark II: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS C500 Mark IIEOS R6 V
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good
6.5Good
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS C500 Mark II

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, Apple ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 162, 138, 163

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    32.5 MP vs 8.85 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    688 g vs 1750 g — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Horse, Airplane, Train

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS C500 Mark II

Pros

  • 5.9K full-frame
  • Dual gain sensor
  • Modular design
  • Pro cinema I/O

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large body
  • Requires cinema lenses

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Resolution
8.85 MP
32.5 MP3.7× more
Sensor type
Super 35 Dual Gain CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
26.1 × 13.8 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R6 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
64,000+0.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS C500 Mark II or EOS R6 V?

EOS R6 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for EOS C500 Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V?

EOS C500 Mark II is 8.85 MP and EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS C500 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS C500 Mark II or the EOS R6 V?

EOS C500 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V?

EOS C500 Mark II weighs 1750 g and EOS R6 V weighs 688 g, so the EOS R6 V is 1062 g lighter.

Do the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V record 4K video?

EOS C500 Mark II: 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R6 V weather sealed?

EOS C500 Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS C500 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 V, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS C500 Mark II launched at $15,999 and EOS R6 V at $2,499. The EOS R6 V is $13,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS C500 Mark II vs EOS R6 V vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.