Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS C500 Mark II

Full-frame cinema flagship with 5.9K 60p, dual gain sensor, and modular design.

$15,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

vs
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

EOS R5 is 10 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

EOS C500 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

3categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS C500 Mark II wins 2 categories·EOS R5 wins 3 categories
  • BEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 8.85 MP)
  • BEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BEOS R5 has lower Weight (738 g vs 1750 g)
  • AEOS C500 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS C500 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 180 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS C500 Mark IIEOS R5
Resolution8.85 MP45 MP
Sensor26.1 × 13.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight1750 g738 g
Battery520 shots490 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 138 × 163 mm

1750 g (3.86 lb / 61.73 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS C500 Mark II is 24mm wider, 41mm taller, and 75mm thicker than EOS R5.

EOS C500 Mark II is 1012 g heavier than EOS R5.

Depth (front-to-back): 163mm EOS C500 Mark II · 88mm EOS R5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 138 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS C500 Mark II

162 × 163 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS C500 Mark II

26.1 × 13.8 mm · APS-C

360 mm² area

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS C500 Mark II: mount data unavailable

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS C500 Mark IIEOS R5
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS C500 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, Apple ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 162, 138, 163

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS C500 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    520 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 8.85 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    738 g vs 1750 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS C500 Mark II

Pros

  • 5.9K full-frame
  • Dual gain sensor
  • Modular design
  • Pro cinema I/O

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large body
  • Requires cinema lenses

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R5
Resolution
8.85 MP
45 MP5.1× more
Sensor type
Super 35 Dual Gain CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
26.1 × 13.8 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R5
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R5
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS C500 Mark II
EOS R5
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS C500 Mark II or EOS R5?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS C500 Mark II — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5?

EOS C500 Mark II is 8.85 MP and EOS R5 is 45 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS C500 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS C500 Mark II or the EOS R5?

EOS C500 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5?

EOS C500 Mark II weighs 1750 g and EOS R5 weighs 738 g, so the EOS R5 is 1012 g lighter.

Do the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5 record 4K video?

EOS C500 Mark II: 4K up to 120p. EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS C500 Mark II and EOS R5 weather sealed?

EOS C500 Mark II: Yes. EOS R5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS C500 Mark II and 490 shots for the EOS R5, giving the EOS C500 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS C500 Mark II launched at $15,999 and EOS R5 at $3,899. The EOS R5 is $12,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS C500 Mark II vs EOS R5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.