Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS M50 Mark II

Popular vlogging APS-C mirrorless with flip screen and easy 4K for creators.

$599

Released Oct 2020

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 5 years newer.

Wins

3categories

EOS M50 Mark II

Travel

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS M50 Mark II wins 1 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 25 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS M50 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (3975 vs 1053)

Key specs at a glance

EOS M50 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution24.1 MP32.5 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60064,000
Burst10 fps40 fps
4K25 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight520 g699 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS M50 Mark II is 179 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS M50 Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS M50 Mark II

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS M50 Mark II: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS M50 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS M50 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • AF points / zones

    3975 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • Weight

    520 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 25 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS M50 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact and affordable
  • Flip touchscreen
  • Eye AF
  • Great for beginners

Cons

  • EF-M mount limited
  • 4K crop
  • Plastic build

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
24.1 MP
32.5 MP+35%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
39753.8× more
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
12 fps+20%
Burst (electronic)
10 fps
40 fps4× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
150 frames2.5× more
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Max resolution
4K UHD
7K RAW
4K max frame rate
25 fps
120 fps4.8× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
2600 Mbps17.3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Codecs
H.264
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Weight
520 g−179 g less
699 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS M50 Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS M50 Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS M50 Mark II is 24.1 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS M50 Mark II does not have IBIS, while eOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M50 Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS M50 Mark II reaches 10 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS M50 Mark II weighs 520 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS M50 Mark II is 179 g lighter.

Do the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS M50 Mark II: 4K up to 25p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS M50 Mark II: No. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M50 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS M50 Mark II launched at $599 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS M50 Mark II is $2,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.