Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS M50 Mark II

Popular vlogging APS-C mirrorless with flip screen and easy 4K for creators.

$599

Released Oct 2020

vs
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Released Jul 2020

EOS M50 Mark II is 3 months newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS M50 Mark II

Travel

Wins

11categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS M50 Mark II wins 1 categories·EOS R5 wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R5 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R5 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 25 fps)
  • AEOS M50 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (3975 vs 1053)
  • BEOS R5 has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS M50 Mark IIEOS R5
Resolution24.1 MP45 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst10 fps20 fps
4K25 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight520 g738 g
Battery640 shots490 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS M50 Mark II is 1mm narrower than EOS R5 but it is also 1mm taller.

EOS M50 Mark II is 218 g lighter than EOS R5.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS M50 Mark II · 88mm EOS R5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS M50 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS M50 Mark II

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS M50 Mark II: mount data unavailable

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS M50 Mark IIEOS R5
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
6.0Good
Wildlife
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS M50 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • AF points / zones

    3975 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98

  • Weight

    520 g vs 738 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 25 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, H.265

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS M50 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact and affordable
  • Flip touchscreen
  • Eye AF
  • Great for beginners

Cons

  • EF-M mount limited
  • 4K crop
  • Plastic build

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R5
Resolution
24.1 MP
45 MP+87%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R5
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
39753.8× more
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R5
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
12 fps+20%
Burst (electronic)
10 fps
20 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
180 frames3× more
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R5
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K RAW
4K max frame rate
25 fps
120 fps4.8× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
2600 Mbps17.3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
Canon Log / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
H.264
RAW, H.265, H.264
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R5
Weight
520 g−218 g less
738 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
138.5 × 97.5 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS M50 Mark II or EOS R5?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS M50 Mark II — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R5?

EOS M50 Mark II is 24.1 MP and EOS R5 is 45 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS M50 Mark II does not have IBIS, while eOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M50 Mark II or the EOS R5?

EOS M50 Mark II reaches 10 fps electronic. EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R5?

EOS M50 Mark II weighs 520 g and EOS R5 weighs 738 g, so the EOS M50 Mark II is 218 g lighter.

Do the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R5 record 4K video?

EOS M50 Mark II: 4K up to 25p. EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS M50 Mark II and EOS R5 weather sealed?

EOS M50 Mark II: No. EOS R5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M50 Mark II and 490 shots for the EOS R5, giving the EOS M50 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS M50 Mark II launched at $599 and EOS R5 at $3,899. The EOS M50 Mark II is $3,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.