Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

Fujifilm

GFX50S II

Affordable medium format entry with 51MP and IBIS.

$3,999

Released Sep 2021

EOS R1 is 2.8 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R1

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

2categories

GFX50S II

Landscape

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·GFX50S II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 2.2 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 3 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,690,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1GFX50S II
Resolution24.2 MP51.4 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 x 32.9 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps3 fps
4K120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6.5-stop
Weight1115 g900 g
Battery455 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

1115 g (2.46 lb / 39.33 oz)

GFX50S II

150 × 104 × 87 mm

900 g (1.98 lb / 31.75 oz)

EOS R1 is 8mm wider and 45mm taller than GFX50S II.

EOS R1 is 215 g heavier than GFX50S II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 87mm GFX50S II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

GFX50S II

150 × 104 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

GFX50S II

150 × 87 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

GFX50S II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GFX50S II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1GFX50S II
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
4.5Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 2.2 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 117 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GFX50S II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • Resolution

    51.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    900 g vs 1115 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

GFX50S II

Pros

  • Medium format under $4K
  • IBIS
  • Great color

Cons

  • Slower AF
  • Large body
  • Limited lens selection vs FF

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
GFX50S II
Resolution
24.2 MP
51.4 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Medium Format Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
43.8 x 32.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
GFX50S II
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF with cross-type AF
TTL Contrast AF
AF points / zones
10539× more
117
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R1
GFX50S II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps4× more
3 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps18.2× more
2.2 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
35 frames
EOS R1
GFX50S II
Max resolution
6K RAW
Full HD
4K max frame rate
120 fps
Max video bit rate
50 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R1
GFX50S II
Weight
1115 g
900 g−215 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
157.6 × 149.5 × 87.3 mm
150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or GFX50S II?

EOS R1 scores 8.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for GFX50S II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and GFX50S II?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and GFX50S II is 51.4 MP, so the GFX50S II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and GFX50S II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while gFX50S II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the GFX50S II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. GFX50S II reaches 3 fps mechanical.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and GFX50S II?

EOS R1 weighs 1115 g and GFX50S II weighs 900 g, so the GFX50S II is 215 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and GFX50S II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. GFX50S II: Full HD.

Are the EOS R1 and GFX50S II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. GFX50S II: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and GFX50S II at $3,999. The GFX50S II is $2,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.