Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS300

Large-sensor travel compact with 20.1MP 1-inch BSI CMOS, 15x 24–360mm Leica zoom, 4K30 video, hybrid O.I.S., and USB-C — ZS200 successor without EVF.

$899

Launch price

Released May 2026

Lumix ZS300 is 1.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

Lumix ZS300

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS300 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 360 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Lumix ZS300
Resolution24.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight920 g337 g
Battery1330 shots360 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix ZS300

111 × 66 × 45 mm

337 g (0.74 lb / 11.89 oz)

EOS R1 is 46mm wider, 83mm taller, and 42mm thicker than Lumix ZS300.

EOS R1 is 583 g heavier than Lumix ZS300.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 45mm Lumix ZS300

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix ZS300

111 × 66 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix ZS300

111 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix ZS300

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix ZS300: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Lumix ZS300
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS300

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I U3

  • Weight

    337 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Lumix ZS300

Pros

  • 1-inch 20.1MP BSI sensor
  • 15x 24–360mm Leica zoom
  • 4K video + 4K Photo burst
  • AF macro from 3 cm
  • USB-C + Bluetooth/Wi-Fi sharing

Cons

  • No built-in EVF (vs ZS200)
  • Slow f/3.3–6.4 aperture
  • Fixed rear screen only
  • $100 premium over ZS200 launch

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Lumix ZS300
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Lumix ZS300
Aperture
f/3.3-6.4
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-360 mm
EOS R1
Lumix ZS300
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R1
Lumix ZS300
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
102,400+3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
25,600
EOS R1
Lumix ZS300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R1 or Lumix ZS300?

EOS R1 scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix ZS300 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Lumix ZS300 is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix ZS300 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Lumix ZS300?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix ZS300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Lumix ZS300 weighs 337 g, so the Lumix ZS300 is 583 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix ZS300: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R1 and Lumix ZS300 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Lumix ZS300: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 360 shots for the Lumix ZS300, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Lumix ZS300 at $899. The Lumix ZS300 is $5,400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Lumix ZS300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.