Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Sony

Alpha 6300

Weather-sealed APS-C workhorse that proved Sony could dominate enthusiast mirrorless.

$999

Launch price

Released Feb 2016

EOS R1 is 8.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

Alpha 6300

TravelWildlife

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·Alpha 6300 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BAlpha 6300 has lower Weight (404 g vs 920 g)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 640 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Alpha 6300
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight920 g404 g
Battery1330 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6300

120 × 67 × 49 mm

404 g (0.89 lb / 14.25 oz)

EOS R1 is 38mm wider, 83mm taller, and 39mm thicker than Alpha 6300.

EOS R1 is 516 g heavier than Alpha 6300.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 49mm Alpha 6300

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6300

120 × 67 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6300

120 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 6300

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6300

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Alpha 6300
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6300

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 120, 66.9, 48.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    404 g vs 920 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Alpha 6300

Pros

  • Weather sealed
  • 425-point AF
  • 4K video
  • Great used value

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Older menu system
  • Superseded

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Alpha 6300
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R1
Alpha 6300
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS R1
Alpha 6300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
Alpha 6300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R1 or Alpha 6300?

EOS R1 scores 9.0/10 versus 6.0/10 for Alpha 6300 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 6300 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Alpha 6300?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 6300 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Alpha 6300 weighs 404 g, so the Alpha 6300 is 516 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 6300: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R1 and Alpha 6300 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Alpha 6300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 640 shots for the Alpha 6300, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Alpha 6300 at $999. The Alpha 6300 is $5,300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Alpha 6300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.