Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Released Jan 2022

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 3.8 years newer.

Wins

3categories

EOS R5 C

Video & HybridWildlife

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

8 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 2 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 3 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 320 shots)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 32.5 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution45 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20064,000
Burst20 fps40 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight770 g699 g
Battery320 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C

142 × 101 × 111 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS R5 C is 4mm wider, 3mm taller, and 23mm thicker than EOS R6 Mark III.

EOS R5 C is 71 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 111mm EOS R5 C · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C

142 × 101 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C

142 × 111 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Landscape
7.5Good
7.5Good
Travel
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142, 101, 111

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
45 MP+38%
32.5 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
40 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+20%
150 frames
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark III
Max resolution
8K RAW
7K RAW
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2570 Mbps
2600 Mbps+1%
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Codecs
Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, H.265, H.264
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark III
Weight
770 g
699 g−71 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
142 × 101 × 111 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R5 C or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 699g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R5 C is 45 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R5 C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while eOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 71 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 C launched at $4,499 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS R6 Mark III is $1,700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.