Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 C

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2022

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 10 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

EOS R5 C

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 1 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Max video bit rate (1360 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 220 shots)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 83 frames)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark II
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst20 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight770 g670 g
Battery220 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C front view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 × 112 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

EOS R5 C is 4mm wider, 3mm taller, and 23mm thicker than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS R5 C is 100 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 112mm EOS R5 C · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C back view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C top view

EOS R5 C

142 × 112 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, AVC-LongG, MP4…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.2, 101.6, 111.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)

  • Max video bit rate

    1360 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,790,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 220 shots — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 83 frames — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
102,400+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R5 C or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 670g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C is 45 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 100 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 220 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 C launched at $4,499 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 C vs EOS R6 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.