Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Released Jan 2022

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 10 months newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R5 C

Video & HybridWildlife

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

8 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 1 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Max video bit rate (2570 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 320 shots)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark II
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst20 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight770 g680 g
Battery320 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C

142 × 101 × 111 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

EOS R5 C is 4mm wider, 3mm taller, and 23mm thicker than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS R5 C is 90 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 111mm EOS R5 C · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C

142 × 101 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C

142 × 111 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CEOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142, 101, 111

  • Max video bit rate

    2570 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
40 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
180 frames
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Max resolution
8K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2570 Mbps7.6× more
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R5 C
EOS R6 Mark II
Weight
770 g
680 g−90 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
142 × 101 × 111 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R5 C or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 680g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C is 45 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while eOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 90 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 C and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 C launched at $4,499 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.