Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
Canon
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Ultracompact pocket point-and-shoot with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.
$379
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
EOS R6 Mark III is 2 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 3,200)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 30 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 7.2 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
100 × 58 × 23 mm
146 g (0.32 lb / 5.15 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 39mm wider, 40mm taller, and 66mm thicker than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A.
EOS R6 Mark III is 553 g heavier than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
100 × 58 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
100 × 23 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact
28 mm² area
30.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
IBIS effectiveness
8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
1080p max frame rate
180 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds H.264 (MP4)
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 99.6, 58, 22.8
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Weight
146 g vs 699 g — lower is better
ISO min (native)
80 vs 100 — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Pros
- ✓True pocket ultracompact (146g)
- ✓12x 25–300mm optical zoom
- ✓Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
- ✓Wi-Fi + NFC
- ✓7.2 fps high-speed burst
Cons
- –Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
- –Full HD only (no 4K)
- –Fixed non-touch LCD
- –microSD storage (not SD)
- –Legacy Mini-USB port
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 20.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A reaches 7.2 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A weighs 146 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 553 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: Full HD.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 180 shots for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A at $379. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is $2,420 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.