Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Canon

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Ultracompact pocket point-and-shoot with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.

$379

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 180 shots)
  • BPowerShot ELPH 360 HS A has lower Weight (146 g vs 920 g)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 7.2 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Resolution24.2 MP20.2 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 × 4.55 mm
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps7.2 fps
4K120 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight920 g146 g
Battery1330 shots180 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A front view

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 58 × 23 mm

146 g (0.32 lb / 5.15 oz)

EOS R1 is 58mm wider, 92mm taller, and 65mm thicker than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A.

EOS R1 is 774 g heavier than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 58 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 23 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 180 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 99.6, 58, 22.8

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC

  • Weight

    146 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Pros

  • True pocket ultracompact (146g)
  • 12x 25–300mm optical zoom
  • Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
  • Wi-Fi + NFC
  • 7.2 fps high-speed burst

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Full HD only (no 4K)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • microSD storage (not SD)
  • Legacy Mini-USB port

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1/2.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
6.17 × 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R1
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Aperture
f/3.6–7.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25–300 mm
EOS R1
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
DIGIC 4+
EOS R1
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
102,400+5 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?

EOS R1 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 20.2 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A reaches 7.2 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A weighs 146 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 774 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: Full HD.

Are the EOS R1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 180 shots for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A at $379. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is $5,920 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.