Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Nov 2025

vs

Canon

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

Updated 1-inch vlog compact with 4K 60p, improved AF, and a tilting touchscreen.

$899

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

EOS R6 Mark III is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

Sports & ActionVlogging

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·PowerShot G7 X Mark IV wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BPowerShot G7 X Mark IV has lower Weight (304 g vs 699 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIPowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Resolution32.5 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight699 g304 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

106 × 61 × 41 mm

304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 33mm wider, 38mm taller, and 47mm thicker than PowerShot G7 X Mark IV.

EOS R6 Mark III is 395 g heavier than PowerShot G7 X Mark IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

106 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

106 × 41 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIPowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105.5, 60.9, 41.4

  • Weight

    304 g vs 699 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

PowerShot G7 X Mark IV

Pros

  • 1-inch sensor
  • 4K 60p
  • Tilting screen
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No EVF
  • Small sensor vs ILC

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Resolution
32.5 MP+62%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R6 Mark III
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
64,000+1.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R6 Mark III
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for PowerShot G7 X Mark IV — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G7 X Mark IV has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV weighs 304 g, so the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is 395 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV, giving the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV at $899. The PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is $1,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs PowerShot G7 X Mark IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.