Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Canon
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Updated 1-inch vlog compact with 4K 60p, improved AF, and a tilting touchscreen.
$899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
6 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BPowerShot G7 X Mark IV has lower Weight (304 g vs 670 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
106 × 61 × 41 mm
304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 33mm wider, 38mm taller, and 47mm thicker than PowerShot G7 X Mark IV.
EOS R6 Mark II is 366 g heavier than PowerShot G7 X Mark IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
106 × 61 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
106 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 105.5, 60.9, 41.4
Weight
304 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 1053
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Pros
- ✓1-inch sensor
- ✓4K 60p
- ✓Tilting screen
- ✓Creator-friendly
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No EVF
- –Small sensor vs ILC
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark IV
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for PowerShot G7 X Mark IV — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G7 X Mark IV has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV weighs 304 g, so the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is 366 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PowerShot G7 X Mark IV: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the PowerShot G7 X Mark IV, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PowerShot G7 X Mark IV at $899. The PowerShot G7 X Mark IV is $1,600 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PowerShot G7 X Mark IV vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.