Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
DJI
Osmo 360
Dual-lens 360 action camera with 1/1.1-inch CMOS imaging, 8K 360 video, 120MP panoramic photos, IP68 10m waterproofing, and 128GB built-in storage.
$549
Launch priceReleased Jul 2025
EOS R6 Mark III is 3 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
Osmo 360
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- BOsmo 360 has lower Weight (183.2 g vs 699 g)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo 360
36 × 81 × 61 mm
183.2 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 102mm wider, 17mm taller, and 27mm thicker than Osmo 360.
EOS R6 Mark III is 516 g heavier than Osmo 360.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 61mm Osmo 360
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360
36 × 81 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360
36 × 61 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Osmo 360
11.5 × 8.6 mm · Compact
99 mm² area
8.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo 360: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo 360
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, Horizon Lock
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 36.3, 81, 61
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Weight
183.2 g vs 699 g — lower is better
Codecs
Adds HEVC
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Battery life (CIPA) — Both 640 shots
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
Osmo 360
Pros
- ✓8K 360 video
- ✓120MP panoramic photos
- ✓IP68 and 10m waterproof
- ✓128GB built-in storage
Cons
- –Fisheye stitching limits underwater use
- –JPEG photos only
- –360 workflow adds editing steps
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
DJI Osmo 360
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or Osmo 360?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo 360 — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Osmo 360 is 30.72 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Osmo 360?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Osmo 360 weighs 183.2 g, so the Osmo 360 is 516 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Osmo 360: 4K up to 100p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo 360 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Osmo 360: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the Osmo 360, giving the Osmo 360 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Osmo 360 at $549. The Osmo 360 is $2,250 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs Osmo 360 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.