Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Osmo 360

DJI

Osmo 360

Dual-lens 360 action camera with 1/1.1-inch CMOS imaging, 8K 360 video, 120MP panoramic photos, IP68 10m waterproofing, and 128GB built-in storage.

$549

Launch price

Released Jul 2025

Osmo 360 is 2.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

Osmo 360

Sports & ActionTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Osmo 360 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo 360 has lower Weight (183.2 g vs 670 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIOsmo 360
Resolution24.2 MP30.72 MP
SensorFull Frame11.5 x 8.6 mm
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps100 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g183.2 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo 360 front view

Osmo 360

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183.2 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 102mm wider, 17mm taller, and 27mm thicker than Osmo 360.

EOS R6 Mark II is 487 g heavier than Osmo 360.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 61mm Osmo 360

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 back view

Osmo 360

36 × 81 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360

36 × 61 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Osmo 360

11.5 × 8.6 mm · Compact

99 mm² area

8.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo 360: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIOsmo 360
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, Horizon Lock

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC

  • Weight

    183.2 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • 4K max frame rate

    100 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    30.72 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Osmo 360

Pros

  • 8K 360 video
  • 120MP panoramic photos
  • IP68 and 10m waterproof
  • 128GB built-in storage

Cons

  • Fisheye stitching limits underwater use
  • JPEG photos only
  • 360 workflow adds editing steps

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360
Resolution
24.2 MP
30.72 MP+27%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
11.5 x 8.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360
Aperture
1.9
Field of view
170 °
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
51,200
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo 360?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo 360 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo 360 is 30.72 MP, so the Osmo 360 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Osmo 360?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo 360 weighs 183.2 g, so the Osmo 360 is 487 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo 360: 4K up to 100p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo 360: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the Osmo 360, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo 360 at $549. The Osmo 360 is $1,950 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo 360 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.