Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Entry MFT body with IBIS and approachable controls.

$699

Released Aug 2020

EOS R6 Mark III is 5.2 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Travel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution32.5 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stop4.5-stop
Weight699 g383 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 85 × 49 mm

383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 17mm wider, 14mm taller, and 39mm thicker than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

EOS R6 Mark III is 316 g heavier than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 49mm OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 85 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121.7, 84.6, 49

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • Weight

    383 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy to use

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • No weather sealing
  • MFT limits

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution
32.5 MP+60%
20.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
4/3 Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
121-point selectable contrast AF
AF points / zones
10538.7× more
121
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Eye
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+38%
8.7 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264, MOV
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Weight
699 g
383 g−316 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
121.7 × 84.6 × 49 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark IV — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M10 Mark IV has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weighs 383 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 316 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, giving the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at $699. The OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is $2,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.