Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Nov 2025

vs
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Entry MFT body with IBIS and approachable controls.

$699

Launch price

Released Aug 2020

EOS R6 Mark III is 5.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 102 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 42 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution32.5 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps29.97 fps
IBIS8.5-stop4.5-stop
Weight699 g383 g
Battery640 shots360 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV front view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 × 49 mm

383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 17mm wider, 14mm taller, and 39mm thicker than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

EOS R6 Mark III is 316 g heavier than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 49mm OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV back view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV top view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 102 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121.7, 84.4, 49

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • Weight

    383 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy to use

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • No weather sealing
  • MFT limits

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution
32.5 MP+60%
20.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Processor
DIGIC X
TruePic VIII
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
ISO min (native)
100−100 less
200
ISO max (native)
64,000+1.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark IV — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-D E-M10 Mark IV has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weighs 383 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 316 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 360 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at $699. The OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.