Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Ricoh

GR IIIx

GR III with a tighter 40mm equivalent GR lens for a natural street, travel, and documentary perspective.

$999

Released Sep 2021

EOS R6 Mark III is 4.1 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

GR IIIx

PortraitVlogging

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·GR IIIx wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 200 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IIIx has lower Weight (262 g vs 699 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIGR IIIx
Resolution32.5 MP24.24 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max64,000102,400
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopYes
Weight699 g262 g
Battery640 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

GR IIIx

109 × 62 × 35 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 53mm thicker than GR IIIx.

EOS R6 Mark III is 437 g heavier than GR IIIx.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 35mm GR IIIx

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

GR IIIx

109 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

GR IIIx

109 × 35 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

GR IIIx

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR IIIx: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIGR IIIx
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IIIx

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 35.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    262 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

GR IIIx

Pros

  • 40mm equivalent GR lens
  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 3-axis SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
GR IIIx
Resolution
32.5 MP+34%
24.24 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
GR IIIx
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Eye
EOS R6 Mark III
GR IIIx
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps3× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps10× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
GR IIIx
Max resolution
7K RAW
Full HD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
EOS R6 Mark III
GR IIIx
Weight
699 g
262 g−437 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
109.4 × 61.9 × 35.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR IIIx — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and GR IIIx is 24.24 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR IIIx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IIIx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and GR IIIx weighs 262 g, so the GR IIIx is 437 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. GR IIIx: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. GR IIIx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 200 shots for the GR IIIx, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and GR IIIx at $999. The GR IIIx is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.