Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR IIIx

GR III with a tighter 40mm equivalent GR lens for a natural street, travel, and documentary perspective.

$999

Released Sep 2021

EOS R6 Mark II is 1.2 years newer.

Wins

5categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

GR IIIx

PortraitVlogging

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GR IIIx wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 200 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IIIx has lower Weight (262 g vs 680 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGR IIIx
Resolution24.2 MP24.24 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight680 g262 g
Battery760 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

GR IIIx

109 × 62 × 35 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 53mm thicker than GR IIIx.

EOS R6 Mark II is 418 g heavier than GR IIIx.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 35mm GR IIIx

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

GR IIIx

109 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

GR IIIx

109 × 35 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

GR IIIx

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR IIIx: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGR IIIx
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IIIx

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 35.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    262 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    24.24 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GR IIIx

Pros

  • 40mm equivalent GR lens
  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 3-axis SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GR IIIx
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.24 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IIIx
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Eye
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IIIx
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps3× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps10× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IIIx
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IIIx
Weight
680 g
262 g−418 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
109.4 × 61.9 × 35.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR IIIx — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GR IIIx is 24.24 MP, so the GR IIIx captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR IIIx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IIIx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and GR IIIx weighs 262 g, so the GR IIIx is 418 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GR IIIx: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IIIx weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GR IIIx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 200 shots for the GR IIIx, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GR IIIx at $999. The GR IIIx is $1,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.