Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
Ricoh
GR IIIx HDF
GR IIIx variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter and a 40mm equivalent lens for softer street photography rendering.
$1,146
Launch priceReleased Apr 2024
EOS R6 Mark III is 1.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
GR IIIx HDF
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 200 shots)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GR IIIx HDF
109 × 62 × 35 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 53mm thicker than GR IIIx HDF.
EOS R6 Mark III is 437 g heavier than GR IIIx HDF.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 35mm GR IIIx HDF
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IIIx HDF
109 × 62 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IIIx HDF
109 × 35 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
GR IIIx HDF
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
GR IIIx HDF: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
GR IIIx HDF
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.9, 35.2
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I
Weight
262 g vs 699 g — lower is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
GR IIIx HDF
Pros
- ✓Built-in HDF effect
- ✓40mm equivalent GR lens
- ✓Pocketable APS-C
- ✓3-axis SR
Cons
- –No ND filter
- –Fixed lens
- –Full HD video only
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Ricoh GR IIIx HDF
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or GR IIIx HDF?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IIIx HDF — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and GR IIIx HDF is 24.24 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR IIIx HDF has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the GR IIIx HDF?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IIIx HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and GR IIIx HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR IIIx HDF is 437 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. GR IIIx HDF: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and GR IIIx HDF weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. GR IIIx HDF: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 200 shots for the GR IIIx HDF, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and GR IIIx HDF at $1,146. The GR IIIx HDF is $1,653 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs GR IIIx HDF vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.