Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Ricoh

GR IIIx HDF

GR IIIx variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter and a 40mm equivalent lens for softer street photography rendering.

$1,146

Launch price

Released Apr 2024

EOS R1 is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

GR IIIx HDF

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·GR IIIx HDF wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 200 shots)
  • BGR IIIx HDF has lower Weight (262 g vs 920 g)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1GR IIIx HDF
Resolution24.2 MP24.24 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopYes
Weight920 g262 g
Battery1330 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IIIx HDF

109 × 62 × 35 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

EOS R1 is 48mm wider, 88mm taller, and 52mm thicker than GR IIIx HDF.

EOS R1 is 658 g heavier than GR IIIx HDF.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 35mm GR IIIx HDF

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IIIx HDF

109 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IIIx HDF

109 × 35 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

GR IIIx HDF

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR IIIx HDF: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1GR IIIx HDF
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IIIx HDF

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 35.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    262 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    24.24 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

GR IIIx HDF

Pros

  • Built-in HDF effect
  • 40mm equivalent GR lens
  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 3-axis SR

Cons

  • No ND filter
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
GR IIIx HDF
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.24 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
GR IIIx HDF
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
40 mm
EOS R1
GR IIIx HDF
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
GR ENGINE 6
EOS R1
GR IIIx HDF
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400
102,400
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
GR IIIx HDF
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or GR IIIx HDF?

EOS R1 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IIIx HDF — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and GR IIIx HDF is 24.24 MP, so the GR IIIx HDF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR IIIx HDF has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the GR IIIx HDF?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IIIx HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and GR IIIx HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR IIIx HDF is 658 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. GR IIIx HDF: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R1 and GR IIIx HDF weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. GR IIIx HDF: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 200 shots for the GR IIIx HDF, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and GR IIIx HDF at $1,146. The GR IIIx HDF is $5,153 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs GR IIIx HDF vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.