Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Released Nov 2025
Sony
Alpha 7R II
Historic 42MP mirrorless that proved high-resolution full-frame could work.
$3,199
Released Jun 2015
EOS R6 Mark III is 10.4 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
Alpha 7R II
2 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 5 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 399)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Alpha 7R II
127 × 96 × 60 mm
625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 12mm wider, 3mm taller, and 28mm thicker than Alpha 7R II.
EOS R6 Mark III is 74 g heavier than Alpha 7R II.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 60mm Alpha 7R II
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Alpha 7R II
127 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Alpha 7R II
127 × 60 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Alpha 7R II
35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame
862 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Alpha 7R II
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7R II
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 126.9, 95.7, 60.3
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Codecs
Adds XAVC S, AVCHD, MP4
Resolution
42.4 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better
Weight
625 g vs 699 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
Alpha 7R II
Pros
- ✓42MP milestone
- ✓5-axis IBIS
- ✓Historic importance
Cons
- –Very dated AF
- –Old video
- –Superseded many times
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Sony Alpha 7R II
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or Alpha 7R II?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Alpha 7R II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Alpha 7R II is 42.4 MP, so the Alpha 7R II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R II has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Alpha 7R II?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7R II reaches 5 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Alpha 7R II weighs 625 g, so the Alpha 7R II is 74 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R II: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R II weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Alpha 7R II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 290 shots for the Alpha 7R II, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Alpha 7R II at $3,199. The EOS R6 Mark III is $400 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.