Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 7R II

Historic 42MP mirrorless that proved high-resolution full-frame could work.

$3,199

Released Jun 2015

EOS R6 Mark II is 7.4 years newer.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

3categories

Alpha 7R II

PortraitLandscape

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 7R II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 399)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 290 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 5 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7R II
Resolution24.2 MP42.4 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps5 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop4.5-stop
Weight680 g625 g
Battery760 shots290 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Alpha 7R II

127 × 96 × 60 mm

625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 3mm taller, and 28mm thicker than Alpha 7R II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 55 g heavier than Alpha 7R II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 60mm Alpha 7R II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 7R II

127 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 7R II

127 × 60 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 7R II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7R II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 399 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 290 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.9, 95.7, 60.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD, MP4

  • Resolution

    42.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    625 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 7R II

Pros

  • 42MP milestone
  • 5-axis IBIS
  • Historic importance

Cons

  • Very dated AF
  • Old video
  • Superseded many times

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R II
Resolution
24.2 MP
42.4 MP+75%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
10532.6× more
399
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2.4× more
5 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps8× more
5 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+50%
120 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R II
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log2
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC S, AVCHD, MP4, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R II
Weight
680 g
625 g−55 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
126.9 × 95.7 × 60.3 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 7R II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Alpha 7R II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7R II is 42.4 MP, so the Alpha 7R II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R II has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 7R II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7R II reaches 5 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Alpha 7R II weighs 625 g, so the Alpha 7R II is 55 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 290 shots for the Alpha 7R II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 7R II at $3,199. The EOS R6 Mark II is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.