Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Released Jan 2024

EOS R6 Mark III is 1.8 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

5categories

Alpha 9 III

WildlifeSports & Action

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 3 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,690,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 250)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIAlpha 9 III
Resolution32.5 MP24.6 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps120 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight699 g703 g
Battery640 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 2mm wider, 2mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 9 III.

EOS R6 Mark III is 4 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIAlpha 9 III
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 250 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • EVF refresh rate

    240 Hz vs 120 Hz — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
32.5 MP+32%
24.6 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 9 III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 9 III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
0 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
120 fps3× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
200 frames+33%
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 9 III
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps4.3× more
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 9 III
Weight
699 g−4 g less
703 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
136.1 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R6 Mark III or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 9.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark III — 120fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Alpha 9 III?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 4 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The EOS R6 Mark III is $3,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.