Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Sony

FX30

Super 35 cinema camera with 4K 120p and affordable entry to Sony Cinema Line.

$1,799

Released Sep 2022

EOS R6 Mark III is 3.2 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

FX30

Video & HybridTravel

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·FX30 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 495)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 32,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIFX30
Resolution32.5 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max64,00032,000
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop5-stop
Weight699 g646 g
Battery640 shots570 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

FX30

130 × 78 × 85 mm

646 g (1.42 lb / 22.79 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 9mm wider, 21mm taller, and 4mm thicker than FX30.

EOS R6 Mark III is 53 g heavier than FX30.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 85mm FX30

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

FX30

130 × 78 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

FX30

130 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

FX30

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX30

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIFX30
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 495 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FX30

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.7, 77.8, 84.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Weight

    646 g vs 699 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

FX30

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • Affordable cinema
  • Active cooling
  • Log profiles

Cons

  • Super 35 crop
  • 26MP stills crop
  • No full-frame

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
FX30
Resolution
32.5 MP+25%
26 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.3 × 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
FX30
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
10532.1× more
495
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark III
FX30
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames2.5× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
FX30
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD / DCI 4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps4.3× more
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
FX30
Weight
699 g
646 g−53 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
129.7 × 77.8 × 84.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or FX30?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for FX30 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and FX30?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and FX30 is 26 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and FX30 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while fX30 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the FX30?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. FX30 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and FX30?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and FX30 weighs 646 g, so the FX30 is 53 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and FX30 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. FX30: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and FX30 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. FX30: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 570 shots for the FX30, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and FX30 at $1,799. The FX30 is $1,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.