Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

FX30

Super 35 cinema camera with 4K 120p and affordable entry to Sony Cinema Line.

$1,799

Released Sep 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 2 months newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

4categories

FX30

Video & HybridTravel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·FX30 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 495)
  • BFX30 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIFX30
Resolution24.2 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight680 g646 g
Battery760 shots570 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

FX30

130 × 78 × 85 mm

646 g (1.42 lb / 22.79 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 9mm wider, 21mm taller, and 4mm thicker than FX30.

EOS R6 Mark II is 34 g heavier than FX30.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 85mm FX30

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

FX30

130 × 78 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

FX30

130 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

FX30

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX30

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIFX30
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 495 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

FX30

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.7, 77.8, 84.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    26 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    646 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

FX30

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • Affordable cinema
  • Active cooling
  • Log profiles

Cons

  • Super 35 crop
  • 26MP stills crop
  • No full-frame

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
FX30
Resolution
24.2 MP
26 MP+7%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.3 × 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
FX30
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
10532.1× more
495
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
FX30
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
FX30
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD / DCI 4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
600 Mbps+76%
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
FX30
Weight
680 g
646 g−34 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
129.7 × 77.8 × 84.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or FX30?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for FX30 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and FX30?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and FX30 is 26 MP, so the FX30 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and FX30 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while fX30 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the FX30?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. FX30 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and FX30?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and FX30 weighs 646 g, so the FX30 is 34 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and FX30 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. FX30: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and FX30 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. FX30: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 570 shots for the FX30, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and FX30 at $1,799. The FX30 is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.