Canon
EOS R6 V
Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased May 2026
Sony
PXW-Z300
Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.
$8,298
Launch priceReleased Oct 2025
EOS R6 V is 7 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 V
Wins
PXW-Z300
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 759)
- AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 V has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 8.3 MP)
- AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)
- BPXW-Z300 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 150 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 × 80 mm
688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PXW-Z300
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
EOS R6 V is 8mm shorter than PXW-Z300 but it is also 8mm wider and 8mm thicker.
EOS R6 V is 108 g heavier than PXW-Z300.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 72mm PXW-Z300
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PXW-Z300
134 × 91 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 V
142 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PXW-Z300
134 × 72 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
PXW-Z300
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 V
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PXW-Z300: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 V
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7
AF points / zones
6097 vs 759 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better
Resolution
32.5 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
Subject recognition
Adds Horse, Airplane, Train
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
PXW-Z300
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
Codecs
Adds ProRes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better
Weight
580 g vs 688 g — lower is better
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 12 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 V
Pros
- ✓7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
- ✓4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
- ✓Active cooling for long-form recording
- ✓Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording
Cons
- –No built-in EVF
- –Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
- –Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
- –Battery grip not supported
PXW-Z300
Pros
- ✓3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
- ✓17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
- ✓AI subject recognition + auto framing
- ✓4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
- ✓Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI
Cons
- –Premium flagship pricing
- –3CMOS not single large sensor
- –Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
- –New platform learning curve
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 V
Sony PXW-Z300
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 V or PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for PXW-Z300 — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and PXW-Z300 weighs 580 g, so the PXW-Z300 is 108 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?
EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R6 V and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?
EOS R6 V: Yes. PXW-Z300: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The EOS R6 V is $5,799 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 V vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.