Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

vs

Sony

PXW-Z300

Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.

$8,298

Launch price

Released Oct 2025

PXW-Z300 is 1.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

Alpha 9 III

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

5categories

PXW-Z300

Sports & ActionWildlife

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 9 III wins 2 categories·PXW-Z300 wins 3 categories
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AAlpha 9 III has higher Resolution (24.6 MP vs 8.3 MP)
  • BPXW-Z300 has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 250)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 9 IIIPXW-Z300
Resolution24.6 MP8.3 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight703 g580 g
Battery400 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z300

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Alpha 9 III is 2mm wider, 6mm taller, and 11mm thicker than PXW-Z300.

Alpha 9 III is 123 g heavier than PXW-Z300.

Depth (front-to-back): 83mm Alpha 9 III · 72mm PXW-Z300

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

PXW-Z300

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

PXW-Z300: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 9 IIIPXW-Z300
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
8.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.6 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • EVF refresh rate

    240 Hz vs 120 Hz — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z300

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 250 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    520 shots vs 400 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF points / zonesBoth 759
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

PXW-Z300

Pros

  • 3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
  • 17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
  • AI subject recognition + auto framing
  • 4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
  • Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI

Cons

  • Premium flagship pricing
  • 3CMOS not single large sensor
  • Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
  • New platform learning curve

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 9 III
PXW-Z300
Resolution
24.6 MP3× more
8.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.6 × 23.8 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Alpha 9 III
PXW-Z300
Processor
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Alpha 9 III
PXW-Z300
ISO min (native)
250
100−150 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
Alpha 9 III
PXW-Z300
Shutter type
Global electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/80000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Alpha 9 III or PXW-Z300?

Alpha 9 III scores 7.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for PXW-Z300 — 24.6MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300?

Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the Alpha 9 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Alpha 9 III or the PXW-Z300?

Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300?

Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g and PXW-Z300 weighs 580 g, so the PXW-Z300 is 123 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?

Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Alpha 9 III and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?

Alpha 9 III: Yes. PXW-Z300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 400 shots (CIPA) for the Alpha 9 III and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the PXW-Z300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 9 III launched at $5,999 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The Alpha 9 III is $2,299 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 9 III vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.