Canon
EOS R8 Mark II
Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2026
DJI
Osmo 360
Dual-lens 360 action camera with 1/1.1-inch CMOS imaging, 8K 360 video, 120MP panoramic photos, IP68 10m waterproofing, and 128GB built-in storage.
$549
Launch priceReleased Jul 2025
EOS R8 Mark II is 1.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R8 Mark II
Wins
Osmo 360
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- BOsmo 360 has lower Weight (183.2 g vs 499 g)
- BOsmo 360 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- BOsmo 360 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 340 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 × 80 mm
499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo 360
36 × 81 × 61 mm
183.2 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)
EOS R8 Mark II is 95mm wider, 9mm taller, and 19mm thicker than Osmo 360.
EOS R8 Mark II is 316 g heavier than Osmo 360.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 61mm Osmo 360
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360
36 × 81 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360
36 × 61 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R8 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Osmo 360
11.5 × 8.6 mm · Compact
99 mm² area
8.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R8 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo 360: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R8 Mark II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds XF-HEVC S
Stabilization modes
Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
AA filter
Only EOS R8 Mark II supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R8 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo 360
Codecs
Adds H.265, HEVC
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, Horizon Lock
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 36.3, 81, 61
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Weight
183.2 g vs 499 g — lower is better
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 340 shots — higher is better
4K max frame rate
100 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R8 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
- ✓Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
- ✓40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
- ✓Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
- ✓Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack
Cons
- –Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
- –No mechanical shutter
Osmo 360
Pros
- ✓8K 360 video
- ✓120MP panoramic photos
- ✓IP68 and 10m waterproof
- ✓128GB built-in storage
Cons
- –Fisheye stitching limits underwater use
- –JPEG photos only
- –360 workflow adds editing steps
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
DJI Osmo 360
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R8 Mark II or Osmo 360?
EOS R8 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo 360 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360?
EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo 360 is 30.72 MP, so the Osmo 360 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Osmo 360?
EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360?
EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Osmo 360 weighs 183.2 g, so the Osmo 360 is 316 g lighter.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360 record 4K video?
EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Osmo 360: 4K up to 100p.
Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo 360 weather sealed?
EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Osmo 360: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 640 shots for the Osmo 360, giving the Osmo 360 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Osmo 360 at $549. The Osmo 360 is $1,350 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Osmo 360 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.