Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs

DJI

Osmo Action 3

Rugged 1/1.7-inch action camera with 4K 120p, dual touchscreens, RockSteady stabilization, and 16m waterproofing without a case.

$329

Launch price

Released Sep 2022

EOS R8 Mark II is 4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

4categories

Osmo Action 3

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 3 categories·Osmo Action 3 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo Action 3 has lower Weight (145 g vs 499 g)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 12 MP)
  • BOsmo Action 3 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IIOsmo Action 3
Resolution24.2 MP12 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.7-inch
ISO max25,60012,800
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight499 g145 g
Battery340 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo Action 3

71 × 44 × 33 mm

145 g (0.32 lb / 5.11 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 61mm wider, 46mm taller, and 47mm thicker than Osmo Action 3.

EOS R8 Mark II is 354 g heavier than Osmo Action 3.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 33mm Osmo Action 3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Action 3

71 × 44 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Action 3

71 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo Action 3: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IIOsmo Action 3
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 12 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Osmo Action 3

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady, HorizonBalancing, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 70.5, 44.2, 32.8

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    145 g vs 499 g — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 340 shots — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

Osmo Action 3

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • Dual touchscreens
  • 16m waterproof without case
  • RockSteady and HorizonSteady

Cons

  • Older than Action 4/5 Pro
  • Small action-cam sensor
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
Osmo Action 3
Resolution
24.2 MP2× more
12 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
1/1.7-inch CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
1/1.7-inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R8 Mark II
Osmo Action 3
Aperture
f/2.8
Field of view
155 °
EOS R8 Mark II
Osmo Action 3
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R8 Mark II
Osmo Action 3
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600+1 stop
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
12,800
EOS R8 Mark II
Osmo Action 3
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R8 Mark II or Osmo Action 3?

EOS R8 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Action 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Action 3 is 12 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Action 3 uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Osmo Action 3?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Action 3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Osmo Action 3 weighs 145 g, so the Osmo Action 3 is 354 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3 record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Osmo Action 3: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Action 3 weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Action 3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 640 shots for the Osmo Action 3, giving the Osmo Action 3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Osmo Action 3 at $329. The Osmo Action 3 is $1,570 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Osmo Action 3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.