Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs
X3

Insta360

X3

5.7K 360 camera with dual 1/2-inch 48MP sensors, 72MP photos, 4K single-lens mode, and IPX8 10m waterproofing.

$449

Launch price

Released Sep 2022

EOS R8 Mark II is 4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

3categories

X3

Travel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 3 categories·X3 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BX3 has higher Resolution (72 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BX3 has lower Weight (180 g vs 499 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IIX3
Resolution24.2 MP72 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2"
ISO max25,6006,400
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight499 g180 g
Battery340 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X3 front view

X3

46 × 114 × 33 mm

180 g (0.40 lb / 6.35 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 24mm shorter than X3 but it is also 85mm wider and 47mm thicker.

EOS R8 Mark II is 319 g heavier than X3.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 33mm X3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X3 back view

X3

46 × 114 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X3 top view

X3

46 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X3: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IIX3
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    180 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X3

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds FlowState, 360° Horizon Lock, Active HDR

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 46, 114, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    72 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    180 g vs 499 g — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X3 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 340 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

X3

Pros

  • 72MP 360 photos
  • 5.7K60 360 video
  • Great value used
  • 10m waterproof

Cons

  • No 8K vs X4
  • Single-lens capped at 4K30
  • Older AI editing

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and X3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
X3
Resolution
24.2 MP
72 MP3× more
Sensor type
CMOS
Dual 1/2" CMOS (360°)
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
1/2"
AA filter
Yes
EOS R8 Mark II
X3
Aperture
f/1.9
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
6.7 mm
EOS R8 Mark II
X3
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R8 Mark II
X3
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600+2 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
EOS R8 Mark II
X3
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R8 Mark II or X3?

EOS R8 Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for X3 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and X3?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X3 is 72 MP, so the X3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and X3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while X3 uses FlowState + 360° Horizon Lock (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the X3?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and X3?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and X3 weighs 180 g, so the X3 is 319 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and X3 record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. X3: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and X3 weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. X3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 640 shots for the X3, giving the X3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and X3 at $449. The X3 is $1,450 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs X3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Insta360 press materials.