Canon
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pocket 1-inch compact with a 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, 4K video, Dual Pixel AF, and live streaming — a classic vlog/travel camera.
$749
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
DJI
Osmo 360 II
Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.
$599
Launch priceReleased Aug 2026
Osmo 360 II is 7.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Wins
Osmo 360 II
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BOsmo 360 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 0 frames)
- BOsmo 360 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- BOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 20.1 MP)
- BOsmo 360 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 29.97 fps)
- BOsmo 360 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 × 41 mm
304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo 360 II
36 × 81 × 61 mm
183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 20mm shorter and 20mm thinner than Osmo 360 II but it is also 69mm wider.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 121 g heavier than Osmo 360 II.
Depth (front-to-back): 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark III · 61mm Osmo 360 II
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360 II
36 × 81 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 41 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo 360 II
36 × 61 mm
Sensor size, to scale
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 105, 60.9, 41.4
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
AA filter
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Eye AF
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Burst (mechanical)
20 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Osmo 360 II
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 0 frames — higher is better
Codecs
Adds OSV, HEVC
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 36.3, 81, 61
Card types
Adds microSD
Resolution
120 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pros
- ✓1-inch stacked 20.1MP sensor
- ✓24–100mm equivalent zoom (4.2×)
- ✓4K 30p and Full HD 120p
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- ✓Live streaming support
Cons
- –Tilt-only screen (not fully articulating)
- –4K limited to 30fps
- –AF weaker than Sony ZV-1 for video
- –No built-in ND filter
Osmo 360 II
Pros
- ✓Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
- ✓14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
- ✓User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
- ✓120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
- ✓105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect
Cons
- –Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
- –100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
- –10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
- –US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II at major authorized retailers.
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
DJI Osmo 360 II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, PowerShot G7 X Mark III or Osmo 360 II?
Osmo 360 II scores 10.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for PowerShot G7 X Mark III — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 20.1 MP and Osmo 360 II is 120 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
How does stabilization compare between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III does not have IBIS, while Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the PowerShot G7 X Mark III or the Osmo 360 II?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III weighs 304 g and Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 121 g lighter.
Do the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II record 4K video?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III: 4K up to 29.97p. Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo 360 II weather sealed?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III: No. Osmo 360 II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and 520 shots for the Osmo 360 II, giving the Osmo 360 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III launched at $749 and Osmo 360 II at $599. The Osmo 360 II is $150 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way PowerShot G7 X Mark III vs Osmo 360 II vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.