Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Canon

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Ultracompact pocket point-and-shoot with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.

$379

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs
PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Canon

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Pocket 1-inch compact with a 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, 4K video, Dual Pixel AF, and live streaming — a classic vlog/travel camera.

$749

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 6.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Wins

5categories

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A wins 2 categories·PowerShot G7 X Mark III wins 3 categories
  • APowerShot ELPH 360 HS A has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 0 frames)
  • BPowerShot G7 X Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (20 fps vs 2.5 fps)
  • BPowerShot G7 X Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (12,800 vs 3,200)
  • BPowerShot G7 X Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 7.2 fps)
  • APowerShot ELPH 360 HS A has lower Weight (146 g vs 304 g)

Key specs at a glance

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS APowerShot G7 X Mark III
Resolution20.2 MP20.1 MP
Sensor6.17 × 4.55 mm13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max3,20012,800
Burst7.2 fps20 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight146 g304 g
Battery180 shots320 shots
4K29.97 fps

Size and weight, to scale

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A front view

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 58 × 23 mm

146 g (0.32 lb / 5.15 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot G7 X Mark III front view

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

105 × 61 × 41 mm

304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 5mm narrower, 3mm shorter, and 19mm thinner than PowerShot G7 X Mark III.

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 158 g lighter than PowerShot G7 X Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A · 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 58 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G7 X Mark III back view

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

105 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

100 × 23 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G7 X Mark III top view

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

105 × 41 mm

Sensor size, to scale

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

4.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePowerShot ELPH 360 HS APowerShot G7 X Mark III
Portrait
1.0Limited
3.0Limited✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
1.0Limited
2.0Limited✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
0.0Limited
Travel
3.5Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
3.5Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Vlogging
2.0Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 0 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 99.6, 58, 22.8

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Vehicle

  • Weight

    146 g vs 304 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MP4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105, 60.9, 41.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (mechanical)

    20 fps vs 2.5 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    12,800 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 7.2 fps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it

  • Touchscreen

    Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Pros

  • True pocket ultracompact (146g)
  • 12x 25–300mm optical zoom
  • Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
  • Wi-Fi + NFC
  • 7.2 fps high-speed burst

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Full HD only (no 4K)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • microSD storage (not SD)
  • Legacy Mini-USB port

PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Pros

  • 1-inch stacked 20.1MP sensor
  • 24–100mm equivalent zoom (4.2×)
  • 4K 30p and Full HD 120p
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF
  • Live streaming support

Cons

  • Tilt-only screen (not fully articulating)
  • 4K limited to 30fps
  • AF weaker than Sony ZV-1 for video
  • No built-in ND filter

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Resolution
20.2 MP
20.1 MP
Sensor type
1/2.3-inch CMOS
1"-Type CMOS
Sensor size
6.17 × 4.55 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Aperture
f/3.6–7.0
1.8 to 2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25–300 mm
24 to 100mm
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Processor
DIGIC 4+
DIGIC 8
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
3,200
12,800+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

What's the resolution difference between the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 20.2 MP and PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 20.1 MP, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A does not have IBIS, while PowerShot G7 X Mark III does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A or the PowerShot G7 X Mark III?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A reaches 7.2 fps electronic. PowerShot G7 X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A weighs 146 g and PowerShot G7 X Mark III weighs 304 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is 158 g lighter.

Do the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III record 4K video?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: Full HD. PowerShot G7 X Mark III: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and PowerShot G7 X Mark III weather sealed?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A: No. PowerShot G7 X Mark III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 180 shots (CIPA) for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A and 320 shots for the PowerShot G7 X Mark III, giving the PowerShot G7 X Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A launched at $379 and PowerShot G7 X Mark III at $749. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A is $370 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way PowerShot ELPH 360 HS A vs PowerShot G7 X Mark III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.