Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Canon
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pocket 1-inch compact with a 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, 4K video, Dual Pixel AF, and live streaming — a classic vlog/travel camera.
$749
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
EOS R6 Mark II is 3.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 0 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 235 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 × 41 mm
304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 33mm wider, 38mm taller, and 47mm thicker than PowerShot G7 X Mark III.
EOS R6 Mark II is 366 g heavier than PowerShot G7 X Mark III.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PowerShot G7 X Mark III: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 0 frames — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 105, 60.9, 41.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
304 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Burst (mechanical)
20 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pros
- ✓1-inch stacked 20.1MP sensor
- ✓24–100mm equivalent zoom (4.2×)
- ✓4K 30p and Full HD 120p
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- ✓Live streaming support
Cons
- –Tilt-only screen (not fully articulating)
- –4K limited to 30fps
- –AF weaker than Sony ZV-1 for video
- –No built-in ND filter
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or PowerShot G7 X Mark III?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for PowerShot G7 X Mark III — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G7 X Mark III does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PowerShot G7 X Mark III?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot G7 X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PowerShot G7 X Mark III weighs 304 g, so the PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 366 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PowerShot G7 X Mark III: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PowerShot G7 X Mark III: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 235 shots for the PowerShot G7 X Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PowerShot G7 X Mark III at $749. The PowerShot G7 X Mark III is $1,750 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PowerShot G7 X Mark III vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.